You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Idea: I could use swimd for 1:1 solving, when target is large. If it is large enough, I could split it to pieces, solve them in parallel, and then combine them. I could use something similar to idea that is used for Hichberg. Possible problem is complexity of combining solutions together: if that part is too slow, the whole idea may not be worth it. Another thing to think about is how to exactly combine the solutions: I should examine Hichberg and start from there, there may also be some other articles that already used similar approach, I should find them and read them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Idea: I could use swimd for 1:1 solving, when target is large. If it is large enough, I could split it to pieces, solve them in parallel, and then combine them. I could use something similar to idea that is used for Hichberg. Possible problem is complexity of combining solutions together: if that part is too slow, the whole idea may not be worth it. Another thing to think about is how to exactly combine the solutions: I should examine Hichberg and start from there, there may also be some other articles that already used similar approach, I should find them and read them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: