pcef issue tracking repo

Per the requirements list:

Must have

• Ability to save and come back to application, review and submit
  • Ok
• Skip pattern
  • Ok
• Select one or more application types (mini, small, planning, large)
  • Ok
• Ability to download application into fillable form
  • Not doable. Users can download any of the three applications. These will need to be pre-formed pdfs. There will be no upload option once the forms are submitted.
• Icon with hover text explainers
  • Ok
• Report download in csv and pdf
  • Ok

Would be nice to have

• Multiple users on same application
  • This isn’t doable in the time allowed. Frankly it’s not doable with the current infrastructure that this application will live on. It would require a purchase of cloud infrastructure and much R&D. We’re essentially talking about a private, custom, google docs experience. Resources simply don’t allow.
• Pull from different inputs to calculate ouput
  • Ok
• Ability to read and make notes
  • Read—Ok. Notes -- Ok if only for staff. Not doable for non-city staff… potentially doable if it’s a group of pre-identified people that is unlikely to change much
• Look and feel
  • Vague but ok

All below is phase two:

Future scoring interface

• Staff control of assigning grants for review to multiple scorers
  • Ok but also needs thought into identity access management (IAM). This is a decision point considering you have non-pdx reviewers
• Scorer access only to those applications they are assigned
  • ok but see above
• Place for scorers to put scores
  • ok but see above
• Ability to read and make notes
  • ok but see above
• Scores only visible to staff
  • ok
• Report generation pulling from defined fields in scoring interface and application interface
  • ok