Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/YourCousin

Clerk note: It's definitely a bad situation, but since all the vandalism is coming from IP addresses they can be blocked without checkuser. If you want to list the IPs here, they will be kept with the case for future reference. Thatcher131 (talk) 03:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have obviously misunderstood what CheckUser is for, this user is vandalising articles, attacking numerous users, evading a ban and keeps changing IP and has admitted having another account. The situation is still rapidly deteriorating and the same user is still being attacked.--Andeh 11:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the past there have been allegations that long-time users have created second accounts for AfD or to file complaints against other users, and these are usually declined as not policy violations (which is true as long as the two accounts don't collaborate). However, this spree of attacks seems more serious, and if there really is a long-term editor behind it, I would want to know. However I am not a checkuser. The best I can suggest is to add some of the IPs and diffs showing the attacks to this page, and then move the listing back up to the outstanding section. One of the checkusers may reconsider your request. Thatcher131 (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User admits again here of having a master account - You see REPMART and YourCousin and YourOtherCousin are all sock puppets of my real account which has no problems and nearly 2,000 edits.--Andeh 17:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Users master account is likely to be under the oppose section of this users RfA, as their whole intention is to prevent the user from achieving adminship.--Andeh 18:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there's something more to this case that the checkusers know about and are unwilling to disclose, I would ask that this case is reviewed again. --Lord Deskana (talk) 17:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not need this user to be harassing me just because I reverted his questionable reversions as well as continue to be harassed through emails sent from his Repmart account. Please review this case and remove this dangerous user from Wikipedia. Ryūlóng 00:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's also this diff that may require immediate attentio: He claims he has 31 ISPs at his disposal. Ryūlóng 01:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a full list of IPs (that will more than likely continue to be updated) here. There have been several range blocks placed on the ranges that he has used, and he has attacked who ever has done so. Ryūlóng 01:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe if we get it long enough one of the bureaucrats might reconsider?--Andeh 01:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the list of ranges so far: 81.174.208.0/21, 213.130.140.0/20, 86.29.0.0/16, 80.225.0.0/16, and 194.164.0.0/16 so far. He claims to have "31 ISPs" and these appear to be only five. Ryūlóng 01:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newest range: 62.249.253.0/24; this may be expanded as the above. Ryūlóng 03:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Manifesto (or whatever) moved from main page

I am the supposed vandal in the Ryulong incident. This was about a simple edit

conflict where Ryulong refused to cite a source for

an outrageous INCEST quote that turned out to be false, so Ryulong provided a new INCEST quote with a source which

susequently, also turned out to be false and the source reflected no bearing on the quote. The page has now been corrected in

opposition of Ryulong and he doesn't like it.

You, the bureaucrats are receiving this plea from Ryulong and his friends including the pretend conversation above, because

Ryulong is up for RFA right now and he is 43/22/6 and they don't like it. They are worried that people will see these

histories.

Ryulong reverted my comments multiple times and then

when I tried to bring it up on the Jeremy Clarkson discussion page, he

deleted my comments seven times, later claiming that it was because they contained personal attacks on him.

The discussion TOPIC and context did not ever mention his name or contain any personal attack.

Ryulong clearly lies when he says: "And I did not delete it seven times. And even in each time it was a rant against me"

Above, Ryulong claims that I am 'dangerous'. The notion is sillier than the phoney incest quotes that he tried to uphold so fervently.

I realise that this is not the place for such discussion, but that's why Ryulong and his friends are here.

I will stop using the sock puppets and go quitely back to my proper account.

He is an 18yr old bully up for admin. I think he's been thrashed enough.

Thanks for reading.

YourCousin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.164.15.121 (talk • contribs) , also — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.249.253.126 (talk • contribs)