Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarceloniUK/Archive
BarceloniUK
- BarceloniUK (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
06 September 2018
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Gargaroi (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Manlorsen (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
These three users have engaged in the article Societat Civil Catalana and its talk page Talk:Societat Civil Catalana. Their histories are full of edit warring. User Manlorsen has also engaged in article Miriam Tey and its corresponding talk page, Talk:Miriam Tey in addition to Societat Civil Catalana. Same behaviour. Article blanking and edit warring. On top of that he stated he belongs to Societat Civil Catalana in an edit summary of a blanking edit (diff: [1]).
It is also suspectful that BarceloniUK first attempts at Societat Civil Catalana article where rejected due to them being written as an advertisement ([2], this content was removed by him, like if he was covering his tracks).
I put some diffs showing identical behaviour among the three users in article Societat Civil Catalana. In any case, their contribution history speaks for itself. Is relatively short and only have contributions to SCC (except Manlorsen and his/her edits to Miriam Tey and its talk page):
- Societat Civil Catalana article page: BarceloniUK ([3], https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Societat_Civil_Catalana&diff=prev&oldid=840100966), Gargaroi ([4], [5], [6]), Manlorsen ([7]).
- SCC talk page: BarceloniUK ([8]), Gargaroi ([9]), Manlorsen ([10]). They refuse to accept any information regarding far-right members and founders, by claiming bias and unreliable sources. The removed content has been restored. Although with possible NPOV problems in the article writting, the sources are considered good.
Hmmm... I think this provides the required information. Three users. Same article (and only article). Same attitude towards it (blanking, edit warring). Ac0a00781 (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
On hold - Pending Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Filiprino. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)- Closing, given the results of the other investigation. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
