Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rebel To the Light

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rebel To the Light

hopelessly non-notable vanity-cruft, presumably created by the books author. Wikipedia even in draft space is not meant to be a host of vanity spam and non-notable fantasies. TAXIDICAE💰 20:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment article was moved to mainspace and back to draft 3 times. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete abused draft to mainspace process. No improvements of article to have external news sources and criticism to show notability. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as repeatedly moved to mainspace when not ready for mainspace.
- - Reads like an advertisement.
  - Does not satisfy book notability.
  - Salt in article space. Salting in article space is even more important than deletion.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also suggest salting Rebel to the Light with lower-case on "to" for caps purposes. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt in mainspace: incredibly promotional, repeatedly moved without improvement. — csc^-1 19:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.