Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Anggun/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several very large paragraphs in the article, which makes the prose hard to read. I suggest that these are broken up into smaller paragraphs. At over 14,000 words, this article has too much detail and is WP:TOOBIG. A subject-matter expert could severely trim the content. There are some uncited statements. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've shortened the article by 20%, splitting off the absurdly long philanthropy chapter, copy-editing, cutting off-topic materials (like lists of other performers), and removing uncited claims. If anybody wants to go further, they're welcome. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chiswick Chap's edits have resolved the size concerns: thanks for your work. The "Accolades" is almost entirely uncited, and also uses IMDB references which should be removed. Z1720 (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most of the accolades were removed, but if there's no source for it, they shouldn't be there. Z1720 (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.