Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 February 17

February 17

File:Ben Michael Jackson.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the cover art used in any single release of the song (discogs, 45cat.com). Instead, this is that of the parent album of the same name by the late Michael Jackson. Should be deleted as redundant to the parent album and misidentification of the topic in question. George Ho (talk) 03:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 45cat does not show the single cover, and Discogs doesn’t either. If that does not work, Delete. To replace, Use any other side label of the single, if it is on 45cat or Discogs. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OsmaniaUniv EnggCollege.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, uploaded 2009 but first appeared on [1] in 2008 according to Tineye, low quality/missing exif make this unlikely to be own work --TheImaCow (talk) 07:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Under Great White Northern Lights box set.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of non-free media here already and no critical discussion. Fails WP:NFCC. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garden of Peace Memorial San Luis Pampanga2.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines, and these sculptures appear to be recent enough to be still under sculptor's copyrights. Per Marchjuly's responses at User talk:Fastily/Archive 6#Restoration of a deleted file, images of copyrighted monuments locally hosted here on English Wikipedia should comply with WP:Non-free content, as enwiki follows the U.S. copyright law and the U.S. copyright law does not provide Freedom of Panorama for monuments and other non-architectural artistic works. Images of unfree public monuments of the Philippines and other no-FoP countries (like Korea and France) must be treated as not free for English Wikipedia, should be tagged with fair use tags, and comply with WP:NFCC. Otherwise, images do not meet and should be deleted. This and other images listed here do not meet as there is no article on the monument itself. Use of the image in articles about the persons or event depicted by the monument fails WP:Fair use rules of English Wikipedia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, disputed license. Michalg95 (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Garden of Peace Memorial San Luis Pampanga35.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected recent sculpture of birds, in the Philippines where there is no Freedom of Panorama. English Wikipedia only follows the U.S. copyright law, and Title 17 of the U.S. Code does not provide Freedom of Panorama for free exploitations of monuments. Similar case to both Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 January 21#File:Luis M. Taruc Hukbalahap Monument1.jpg and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 February 17#File:Garden of Peace Memorial San Luis Pampanga2.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Public and its Problems, 1927, Cover.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to File:The Public and its Problems, 1927, Cover.jpg Hekerui (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Philippine Dog Circuit Show 7.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a trophy? Possible derivative work problem. We don't have sufficient details on when this was designed and who was the designer. Permission from owner (should the uploader insists) is invalid; we need commercial license permit from the designer. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bird on poles1.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Useless image file, orphaned and unused. May not pass Wikimedia Commons' educational scope standards. Uploader appears to have only uploaded this file to treat English Wikipedia as a file host (but, see WP:NOTFILESTORAGE). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Valenzuela16Dec202311.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image heavily focuses on the parade float artwork, in a non-incidental manner. See c:Commons talk:Copyright rules by subject matter#Parade floats. Not eligible for fair use tagging as there is no article about this specific parade float itself. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Briefly, I quote the paraphrased synopsis of our 40 minutes telephone conference with a senior Bureau of Copyright and Related Rights officer on the matters under discussion: "Valenzuela 440, my official reply to your query follows - Point 1: the IPO does not issue verbal answers to present and COVID-19 lockdowns queries. It only issues written official statements upon submission of formal written queries Point 1a: It never issued a written statement to Wikimedia Commons Foundation or to any Internet portals on FoP copyright photography and uploading; Point 2: the IPO including the Courts have never encountered and case of copyright violation FoP photography and uploading to any internet site including Wikipedia; Point 3: the IPO opines that taking photos in the open on FoP subjects and uploading them in Wikimedia-Wikipedia does not raise any copyright violation since the matter is of first impression; Point 3: the IPO's will issue a written official ruling on your query if you submit a formal written query duly signed by you letter, or it may even write Wikimedia Foundation; however, the IPO cannot order Wikimedia or any Internet site to follow the IPO ruling; if your desire further action, you must direct your query to other RP government agencies that have exclusive jurisdiction on the matter of action of RP photos on FoP."

I opted to ask guidance from the IPO office, but I state that any official written ruling I may receive is only persuasive, and cannot in any manner delay the action of deletion or keeping of my photos, nor can it influence Wikipedia or Wikimedia Foundation, since it is bound by USA laws and Americal Jurisprudence, very sincerely yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 11:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Delete – No need to have a parade float. May be non-free, and may fail NFCC. Not contextually significant to the film itself. George Ho (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pamantasannglungsodngpasig.gif

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense as non-free. Whpq (talk) 03:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this file is actually creative commons, given that its an old version of a university logo https://plpasig.edu.ph/ Mason (talk) 22:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense to non-free logo and add a fair use. Salavat (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.