Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 March 6
March 6
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 April 8. ✗plicit 06:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- File:Show Me the Way by Peter Frampton UK vinyl side-A.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:NAIA-AIRPORT-parking.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CreativExplorer101 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Author ("John Paul Solis") doesn't seem to be the uploader User:CreativExplorer101. Are they the same person or not? This might fail at WikiCommons because of this, even if FOP is finally introduced in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 April 8. ✗plicit 06:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- File:Notes from the Second Year cover, New York Radical Women.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:Manqabat-e-Qari Muslehuddin.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ibne.adhi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is unused. I can't read the text so I do not know if it is useful. But my guess is no since it is not in use. MGA73 (talk) 12:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Would have been better if it was WP:PRODed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: The uploader of this file hasn't edited since 2010, but this file was once used in Muhammad Muslehuddin Siddiqui as shown here, but was removed here the very next day after it was added to the article. While I can't read this, there's a chance that it's protected by copyright which means it would need to be treated as non-free content and meet WP:NFCCP, which is something I don't see as currently being acceptable per WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#7 and WP:NFCC#8. Even if the image itself isn't eligible for copyright protection, it still seems unnecessary per MOS:TEXTASIMAGES. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 05:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:LarryDimarzio 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LarryDiMarzio (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused file. Derivative work. User name matches the person claimed to be on the photo but it does not look like a selfie. MGA73 (talk) 13:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:TommySotomayor-on-LouderWithCrowder-Sept2016.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sburns90 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unless I am missing something, or the license was changed later, this does not appear to be licensed under a Creative Commons license. Dylsss(talk contribs) 18:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:Natural la1.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stevey7788 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused except for in uploaders gallery. Uploader is blocked. MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Move to Commons: if this file's licensing is correct, this could be moved to Commons because it most likely would meet c:COM:SCOPE. The fact that the uploader has been blocked, doesn't necessarily means someone else might not be able to find an encyclopedic use for the image. I agree though that there's no need for this local version on Wikipedia and most of the other map files on User:Stevey7788/Maps seem to bee Commons files; so, this one should be moved to Commons and then the local version deleted per WP:F8. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I moved the other uploads of the user to Commons because they were in use. The file is from 2005 and if anyone would like to use a file about naturalized citizens in Los Angeles my guess is that it would be more relevant to use newer data. Also I think it will be hard to use the file when there is no information about what the colors mean. So we do not know if a the darkest color means 10 percent or 0.1 percent. But IF it is relevant then I agree that Commons is the right place for it. --MGA73 (talk) 09:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.