Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 August 3
August 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:Dragonheart-logo-yellow.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZorahErso (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Too complex to be in the public domain. funplussmart (talk) 02:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- How is it too complex for public domain? It's a text-only film franchise logo like Star Wars, The Terminator, and The Lord of the Rings. ZorahErso (talk) 03:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- @ZorahErso:, Commons:Threshold of originality shows examples of images, especially logos, that are either in the PD or are copyrighted due their originality. funplussmart (talk) 18:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. funplussmart, I can see what you were thinking due to all the irregularities in the letters and not so long ago I would have shared your doubt. But this logo is similar to the Cyberpunk 2077 logo in terms of complexity, and that was ruled to be ineligible for copyright protection by the US Copyright Office. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 August 12. ✗plicit 03:22, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:HelenaBrewersCapLogo.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Book cover of PETER NAGY, Entertainment Erases History. Works 1982 to 2004 to the Present, Brooklyn, Eisbox Projects (2014).jpeg
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:Book cover of PETER NAGY, Entertainment Erases History. Works 1982 to 2004 to the Present, Brooklyn, Eisbox Projects (2014).jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valueyou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in both Peter Nagy (artist) and Richard Milazzo which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free cover art such as this is generally allowed to be used in stand-alone articles about the book it represents for primary indentification purposes, but the use of book covers in other articles or in other ways typically requires that the cover art itself be the subject of sourced critical commentary per WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and WP:NFC#CS and not just added to the article to support general content about the book. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Side-note: this is part of a long-term campaign of WP:promotion of people and stuff associated with Richard Milazzo. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:08, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:White Marc Bouwer dress of Angelina Jolie.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Premeditated Chaos (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Photo is sourced from Rex Features, which is/was a photo agency. Per WP:GETTY, this is not allowed unless the photo is itself the subject of sourced commentary in the article, which is not the case here (the article is about the dress, not the photo). Colin M (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Now I understand the issue and have tagged it for G7. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:Cloud Security Alliance logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Senator2029 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned, superseded by File:Cloud Security Alliance logo.png. — Pbrks (talk) 18:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:The Garden of Forking Paths (Once Upon a Time).jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sahaib3005 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This non-free screenshot used in the infobox of a TV episode article is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. As documented at {{infobox television episode}}, "A non-free screenshot should be used only if it meets the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria, i.e. typically if it is required to illustrate a crucial element of the episode that is the object of explicit, sourced analytical commentary and where that commentary is in genuine need of visual support." There is no such commentary here. Whpq (talk) 18:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq:, I uploaded a better image that is more useful. The previous image was just a bunch of characters. This one shows Cinderella (Jacinda Vidrio) and a crowd of people. Sahaib3005 (talk) 13:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploading a different image doesn't resolve the issue of WP:NFCC#8. There is still no significant sourced commentary about this image either. -- Whpq (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:Biography shivashankar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Manandharg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused, claims to be own work but doesn't look like own work but anyway regardless, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:Cobbetts logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rangoon11 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned; superseded by File:Cobbetts logo.png — Pbrks (talk) 21:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant to PNG file. Salavat (talk) 13:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- File:Coclogosmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RickyCourtney (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned; superseded by File:College of the Canyons logo.svg. — Pbrks (talk) 23:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 13:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.