Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 15

< September 14	September 16 >

September 15

Big Brother Brasil logos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: move old logos to first season used. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 18:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative use of multiple non-free logos in Big Brother Brasil. The non-free use of the current logo "File:Big Brother Brasil logo 4.jpg" can be justified since it has been the main logo used by the program since introduced in 2014. In fact, it probably should be moved to the main infobox. The non-free use of the reaming three former logos, however, does not comply with WP:NFCC#3a or WP:NFCC#8.

None of these former logos are specifically the subject of any sourced critical commentary anywhere in the article (this is no discussion of the logo's branding at all) so the context for using them in the main articlerequired by NFCC#8 is not there. It might be possible to move them to main infoboxes of Big Brother Brasil 1, Big Brother Brasil 7 and Big Brother Brasil 12 since those are the seasons where the three foremr logos were first used, but the non-free use rationales for each file will have to be tweaked accordingly.

Suggest keep in the main article for the current logo "File:Big Brother Brasil logo 4.jpg" and moving the former logos "File:Big Brother Brasil logo 1.jpg", "File:Big Brother Brasil logo 2.jpg" and "File:Big Brother Brasil logo 3.jpg" to the main infoboxes of the respective stand-alone articles about the individual seasons where each was used for the first time. Non-free use should, however, be limited to only the first season where the logo was used per items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support suggestion from Marchjuly. Salavat (talk) 03:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rejected IPC logo (1991).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Logo is not in my view simple as claimed, Acceptable as non-free use as it is in a relevant article. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's obviously non-free, and I have tagged it as such. However, I'm pretty sure that it fails WP:NFCC#8. Probably would be best to delete this one IMO -FASTILY 00:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agreed that the proposed logo is not sufficiently important to the prose's context to warrant a non-free depiction (WP:NFCC#8). czar 04:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KPMG Figure2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This infographic is not simple as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hostinger company logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work, Logo may be simple, but nontheless a third party design. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Velayudham Audio Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:FILMMUSIC and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sura Audio Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:FILMMUSIC and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nanban Audio Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:FILMMUSIC, WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10a. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kaavalan Audio Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:FILMMUSIC and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vettaikaaran Audio Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:FILMMUSIC and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 14:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of California, State Parking Garage, 10th and O, Sacramento, California.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:Seal of California.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not meant to be *the* image of the seal for use on Wikipedia. It is only a sample of the seal that can be found in Sacramento. I've uploaded many variations of the seal for use in the California State Seal article. These should not be superseded, either, as they show the variety of artistic interpretations over the years. Blcksx (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Blcksx: Fair enough, I will adjust the copyright tag to better reflect the licensing status. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of the President of the Philippines.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:Seal of the President of the Philippines.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Secret-man.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Grandfathered old file (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 18:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence of permission Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This was pre-OTRS, and I don't have record of it, but I believe that per the summary, someone at Simon & Schuster signed off. Sadly there's no page yet about the book; it's also clearly fair use in context. – SJ 00:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See c:COM:GOF. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seniornetlogo2.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

probable copyrighted logo, no evidence of permission for release into the public domain. Globe makes it too complex for {{PD-simple}} Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SeniorWoo.com-Merry Xmas!.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

doubt that this is uploader's own work Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Serbiabre.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:Flag of Serbia.svg - otherwise unused Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spinifex pigeon ormiston gorge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: "Not to be used by others for commercial purposes" - licensing conditions unallowed on Wikipedia. It must be free also for commercial use. XXN, 16:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wedge-tailed eagle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: "not for commercial use" - licensing conditions unallowed on Wikipedia. It must be free also for commercial use. XXN, 16:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BeaverTails in Ottawa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lower-res edit of File:Beaver Tails in Byward Market, Ottawa.jpg, probably worth deleting the low-res copy and performing subsequent edits on the higher quality image Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Toronto EMS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality photo, no foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tortiseshell kitten.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

poor quality photo of pet, not appropriate for encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the relationship between Tonya Marcotte (the photograper) and Rabbitfighter (the uploader) is unclear. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arak saggi (distilled beverage).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1, as with images featured in the vodka article, any user may take a photo of the beverage and upload it with a free license provided that any branding is either {{PD-simple}} or de minimis. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additionaly, the file fails WP:FREER in all articles. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is similar to File:Cola Couronne bottle.jpg which was discussed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 August 4. The shape of the bottle cannot be copyrighted, but the label might be per c:COM:Packaging. So, the question is whether the article is about a particular product; if it is, then non-free use seems OK and WP:FREER wouldn't apply to label. The photo itself, however, will need a separate license. On the other hand, if this is just a general article about the a particular type of spirit, then there's no reason to use a non-free image per the nominator and the file sould be deleted. For reference, File:Aragh sagi.jpg does exist on Commons. Someone posted about it on Talk:Aragh Sagi, but the post's not in English. If the Common's licensing is OK, then it can be used instead in the article. If there's some doubt, it might also be possible to blur/pixelate out the dog imagery like was done with respect to File:PixelatedHuyFongSriracha.jpg. The same might also be able to be done to "File:Arak saggi (distilled beverage).jpg" (maybe by someone at WP:GL/P), but the photo itself would still need a copyright license. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.