Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 24

< September 23	September 25 >

September 24

File:Digic logo 520.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inverse Bantaxaver (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DIGIC PICTURES negativ Logo500x320Px.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:04, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

.jpg to be resized Bantaxaver (talk) 00:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Broken exit sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned low quality photograph of a broken exit sign. Higher quality images, such as File:Exit sign.jpg exist. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:17, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Exitsign.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution and low quality photograph of an exit sign. Higher quality images, such as File:Exit sign.jpg exist. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to File:Exit sign.jpg. I believe the nominator is right. Despite the widespread use of this file, it can be safely deleted and redirected, so that its instances of usage remain undisturbed. Fleet Command (talk) 10:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Etchecolatz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a political banner about Miguel Etchecolatz, and does not follow the Non-free content criteria. It is not a banner noteworthy in itself (as the "hope" poster of Obama), but just a random poster taken from somewhere in the internet. It fails NFCC #1: it does not say anything that couldn't be explained in mere words, in fact it's not even mentioned in the body of the article. It fails NFCC #4: a casual internet user combining a photo and text with an image editor and uploading the result in the internet can hardly be considered as "previous publication", at least for the purpose meant by the policy (which is meant to set apart, for example, a picture of Superman taken from a comic book cover and a fan-art drawing of Superman). It fails NFCC #8: it does not increase the understanding of the topic, nor there is any significant loss in the removal. And last but not least, it introduces a clear violation of the neutral point of view. Cambalachero (talk) 02:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:From afar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extreme low-res; orphaned; unencyclopedic. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OUTSIDE.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality; unidentified subject; orphaned. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Outside.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified subject. Nothing remarkable about it. Outside Commons' scope (lacks educational value). — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KingBen Daniel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is my image, which is no longer used in any Wikipedia article. I'd like it deleted now it isn't being used. Thanks! K.O.T.W (talk) 02:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Erwin Lambert.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A higher quality file, with public domain rights, has been uploaded. Hoops gza (talk) 03:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karolinapurplelightz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Professional style photo of an individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image has been tagged as missing source. Such issues should get tagged, then speedily deleted if necessary instead of being brought to FfD. –Dream out loud (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The file has a source. Please read the license tag ({{pd-self}}). -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-self}} doesn't necessarily imply that the source of the image is the uploader. Technically, it should, but when I first started uploading images here a long time ago without displaying a source, they were tagged as "no source" for just having {{PD-self}}. A lot of lazy editors will just take images from websites and stick on a {{PD-self}} tag and call it a day. I've had many images deleted over time because editors finally do add a source and it's someone besides themselves despite the license tag. In my experience, tagging with "no source" is the best way to deal with these kind of situations, otherwise the FfD seems like a violation of WP:AGF by just assuming that the free image the user uploaded is "probably copyrighted".

It's ironic that you cite WP:AGF. You do not assume good faith by tagging a clearly labeled pd-self image with no-source. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All images must have tags and descriptions. A description alone cannot describe an image's copyright status, so a copyright tag cannot describe its source. Otherwise, what would the point be of having the {{di-no source}} template? Tagging an image for missing a source is not violating WP:AGF. It's just stating that image doesn't have a source listed. A copyright tag stating "I, the copyright holder, ..." doesn't technically count as a source. So there's no bad faith there. It's just tagging a page for missing information. Unlike you, I don't nominate images for deletion on the basis of assuming that the uploader is not the copyright holder. "No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder"? Well what's the reason given to suggest that he/she isn't? –Dream out loud (talk) 07:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You just contradicted yourself three times. If you're not going to admit your error, you might as well not bother responding... -FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contradicted myself how? Unlike most editors here, I have no problem to admitting mistakes I made. I don't know how else to go about discussing an image that is "Likely copyrighted" (according to you) without any basis, except for requesting a source from the uploader. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is no evidence of copyright violation. All seems to be in order. Nominator is kindly advised to submit such cases to WP:PUF. Fleet Command (talk) 12:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lady-gaga-born-this-way-album-cover-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Lifebaka (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:21, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I realized i didn't tag a license. Rackshea (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ParkerLewisAd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture fails the non-free content criteria, as it is only used for illustration and doesn't enhance the understanding of the topic and article doesn't contain critical commentary about it. There is also an image on the article with the main characters File:Parkerlewis.jpg. Sir Armbrust ^{Talk to me} _Contribs 10:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boracay123.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo with no possible encyclopedic use. Sreejith K (talk) 11:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seating by seven island pond.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Catholicate seal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Desirater.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. Summary seems to be advertising for a website. —Bkell (talk) 16:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cuonfoot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This file is tagged with {{PD-India}}, which seems to be accurate, since the author died in 1947, more than 50 years ago. However, the {{PD-India}} tag says that the image cannot be kept unless it is also in the public domain in the United States, which would require that it was in the public domain in India in 1996, which would require the author to have died before 1941, which is not the case. So it seems that this image is not in the public domain in the United States. If this is true, it is a non-free image, and we cannot justify its use here under the non-free content criteria, because it is potentially replaceable by a free image (hence failing WP:NFCC#1). —Bkell (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Erebus logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and unencyclopedic, Commons won't want this Acather96 (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looked at the picture, and indeed nominator is right. Reminds me of case in which Wikipedia was used as a mirror. I am not saying this case is similar to that; but I do believe that the potential use is probably similar. Fleet Command (talk) 09:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christian Weierbach and a red light.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned/unencyclopedic user image Acather96 (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ash Ketchem.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned/unencyclopedic user image. Acather96 (talk) 19:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Big Simling Season One Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible copyright issues Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bugofthejar.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:P.C. Outlaw Monster Truck.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan file. Non-useful Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 22:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer to Commons. Clearly an image of a car; it is of good quality and can potentially be used in an article about this type of vehicle. Though feel free to disregard my advice if there is something I don't understand; I am not a vehicle specialist after all. Fleet Command (talk) 09:28, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Law Offices of Jeffrey Kroll.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of some sort, used in a now deleted advert. no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not worth transferring to Commons. (Possibly fails a dozen of Commons policies.) I think the nominators is most probably right. Fleet Command (talk) 09:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused, unencyclopedic logo for a (most likely) non-notable lawfirm. No reason to keep. –Dream out loud (talk) 00:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paclitaxel Tetrahedron 1996 2291.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality (badJPG, compression artifacts); Commons version: File:Paclitaxel JMolBiol 2001 1045.jpg. Leyo 22:57, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although CSD F8 does not apply here, but the Commons version indeed fulfills the needed role. (It is from a slightly different camera angle.) Fleet Command (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia Fail!!!.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, inappropriate file name; was never in use. Leyo 23:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per F8. File is available on Wikimedia Commons as File:Hydroamination-2.svg. The latter is in use in Wikipedia. Fleet Command (talk) 09:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Pineapple Thief LIVE -4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License is not acceptable for Wikipedia (image states it is CC-BY-NC-SA). –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per F3. Verified nominator's statements and they were correct. Fleet Command (talk) 09:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.