Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 16

< October 15	October 17 >

October 16

File:BCS national championship trophy and Bevo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: This image was kept in a previous deletion discussion a few years back, but it appears to have been kept in error and before WP:NFCCs were properly enforced. There doesn't seem to be any particular significance to the image - it's just a pretty ordinary graphic of a championship trophy with the school mascot. It's described and mentioned, but not discussed, and I doubt we'd have any trouble understanding the subject if this image were missing. Mosmof (talk) 02:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't see how it contributes significantly to the article. Nyttend (talk) 13:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nyttend, I see no point in this. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EdHAvril28crop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unused cropped version of image on commons Skier Dude (talk 05:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shriya Saran.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image was moved to commons and subsequently deleted. See the deletion talk archive at commons. Sreejith K (talk) 05:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kara-honeymv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the file does not add significantly to readers' understanding, nor is this specific screenshot being critically discussed. — ξ ^xplicit 08:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BRIGHT Sora iro CD DVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 08:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BRIGHT Tegami CD DVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 08:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BRIGHT I'll be there CD DVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 08:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BRIGHT Kotoba ni Dekinakute CD DVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 08:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BRIGHT - CD DVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 08:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RZCD-46451.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 08:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:12lovestoriesDVD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This alternate cover is not significantly different from the main cover and is not subject to sourced critical commentary to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 09:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glojeans.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair-use. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MudC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair-use. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angelsflowerjeans.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair-use. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as this is obviously correct. (Note: I've tagged it for RfU) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flareangels.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair-use. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Speedy delete as replaceable; so tagged. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angelsjeans.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair-use. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Speedy delete as replaceable; so tagged. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Isabella d'Este.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inferior in every way to File:Tizian 056.jpg, which depicts the same Titian painting. Nyttend (talk) 12:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GiovanniBattistaMoroniTitianSchoolmaster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A better rendition of the same painting is available as Commons:File:Giovanni Battista Moroni 016.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A0000d7e.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greatly inferior to this Commons image of the same painting, but not identical, so it can't be deleted under F8. Nyttend (talk) 13:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kelljohn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A much better image of the same PD-art original is available at Commons:File:KellsFol291vPortJohn.jpg, but the two images are clearly different enough that this one can't be deleted under F8. Nyttend (talk) 13:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MyNameIsModesty.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image fails WP:NFCC in having contextual significance. Actor from film is living, and a free image can be procured. Otherwise, no reason to use copyrighted material to display a completely random scene from the film. Image was used at Modesty Blaise, where only one cited sentence exists, and at the film article My Name Is Modesty, which has minimal coverage and nothing that a non-free image helps visually illustrate. A solid example of where a screenshot is actually appropriate is Changeling (film)#Closing sequence. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Erik hit it on the head. Both uses fail WP:NFCC #1. Novaseminary (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arch file.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. PhilKnight (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very poor quality, unclear detail. Drmies (talk) 02:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image is used on wikipedia article "Karnataka history timeline", so try not to delete it.I will try to upload new file when available.

Jrsanthosh (talk) 09:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. If the file is in use it shouldn't be deleted. No file at all is clearly lower quality in most senses than a not perfect file. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.