Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 June 2

< June 1	June 3 >

June 2

File:Death - Back From The Dead-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Od Mishehu (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fair use image. SummerPhD (talk) 03:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I support SummerPhD in this - the file leads to nothing. Best, A Sniper (talk) 21:48, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bissel-Israel.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic/dim, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep So an eighteenth-century image isn't encyclopedic or useful? Send to Commons. Nyttend (talk) 12:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perfectly readable at full resolution. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep quality good enough, possible encyclopedic use, should possible be moved to Commons. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Windows 7 Taskbar (US).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Od Mishehu (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader cannot claim copyright on this as it is not his own work. Furthermore, a suitable version is already available here. GSK (talk ● evidence) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. clear copyright violation. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SimPE on Windows 7.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Od Mishehu (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader cannot claim copyright on this file because it is not his own work. GSK (talk ● evidence) 04:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious delete —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:05, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- On Commons it is, but the image is here. The image is not orphaned; does it meet WP:NFCC for "fair use"? PleaseStand ^(talk) 08:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collier 1918 death.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to assume good faith here but "Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use" is 100% incorrect for this and the other images nominated. It is a hi-res gif of 157 KB image, it appears in the references for the linked article with url=Media:xxxx.gif link so it is not orphaned, and obviously has a use since it is already used in the article. I don't thing any investigation has been done, this is just a rote addition of a delete template to each of the images previously listed for deletion in a dodgy fashion that was found to be inadequate. Please also come to my talk page where more articles in the public domain are being tagged for deletion in a rote manner because the source listed as "New York Times on March 30, 1937" is being rejected as inadequate. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 10:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The quality level is high enough to read it once you click on it and make it larger. And this gives a historical account of an event mentioned in an article. Dream Focus 16:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not orphaned, high quality, its used in the article.
Keep perfectly readable.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do we have a template for "This image should be copied or transcribed to Wikisource", along the lines of {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}? {{Copy to Wikisource}} seems to be for articles rather than page scans. Anomie ⚔ 11:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At one time I had the full OCR text, but I don't have it anymore. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 06:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Collier 1918a.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not orphaned, high quality, its used in the article.
Speedy delete, available on commons.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 1139.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is no longer orphaned. Two articles use it now. And it isn't of low quality either. Dream Focus 16:48, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also a bit confused here. The image is of perfectly reasonable technical quality and education value. Perhaps you tagged the wrong image? Juliancolton (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Got wood for sheep?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ivermectin.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, superseded by svg version. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, superceded by SVG version.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Osborne 024a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't unencyclopedic. It just got replaced by another image, used in articles instead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Osborne_022a.jpg is used in articles instead. Any reason to keep both images around? Dream Focus 16:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both images are used in the article on Osborne Art Studio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958-) (talk • contribs)

I see 22a and 23a only being used there, not 24a. Dream Focus 05:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I added it, they all look the same to me ... I will be back in Chicago in two weeks to try and get a better photo of him, and I will take better photos of some of his work, I don't have a good macro lens so I had to take a wide shot and just crop out the plate and cups. I broke one last time. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 06:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poe 1908May29.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shows a historic article about a Successful Demonstration of an Artificial Respiration. Was this the first time it was demonstrated though? Could it of use in the Artificial respiration article? Dream Focus 16:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peek at the article on Poe, there is a link to the image already. The problem is that images only link back if they are displayed, this one appears in the references section so it does not display. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll point out that if you substituted {{cite news}} and then replaced http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Poe_1907_pumps_copy.gif with File:Poe_1907_pumps_copy.gif you would avoid future nominations of this sort. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My first idea had some issues, but there are ways to at least have the image show up on the "What links here" page. Continuing on my talk page. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let me take a peek at that. I have been trying to figure out how to get around not having the image display and still have it link to a reference. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I see, the link in the title section, I will switch them when I come across them now. Now I don't even bother loading to Wikipedia, I load to my Flickr account and Picasa account and link to that image there. It is too much work to load here and have it deleted in the future. There is an great article on why the Library of Congress and others chose Flickr Commons over Wikimedia Commons over that very issue. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 04:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not orphaned, high quality, its used in the article.
Keep, perfectly good image of a PD news article--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 06:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poe Trenton Times, The (Trenton, New Jersey) 1883 August 17 (cropped).gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As was determined in the FFD just closed a few seconds ago (they are being renominated again in mass) the images are being used in the article on the subject, the link in the references goes to the image. This is again a mass nomination for an issue that what just closed. Oddly Fastily is removing the original delete notices as k for keep, then renominating them for deletion in the next edit. Also no friendly notices have been provided. He is also deleting whatever source annotations I add as in here. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not orphaned, high quality, its used in the article.
Keep, perfectly good image of a PD news article. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not used in article, don't see the value --JaGa^talk 17:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is used in the article, did you actually check at the article? Click on the link in the reference section and it takes you to the image. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Used as a reference in and linked from George Poe. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 06:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Schneider-Eddie NYT 1930ff.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is NOT orphaned, its used in the article about the guy. It is not low quality, you just click on it to make it larger, and you can easily read it. And it has a use, obviously. Dream Focus 16:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, perfectly good article, assuming uploader is correct about lack of renewal.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The file is in use in the most topical way possible. Torchiest ^talk/_contribs 18:49, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wittpenn marriage.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not orphaned, high quality, its used in the article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not orphaned, high quality --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see it used in any article, nor see a use for it. --JaGa^talk 17:47, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is used in the article, did you actually check at the article? Click on the link in the reference section and it takes you to the image. There is a flaw in the software where it doesn't link back when used in the reference section, but you actually have to look before you comment. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Used as reference in and linked to from H. Otto Wittpenn. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 02:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sibghatullah Mojaddedi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

living person. cannot be used as FU Vssun (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:England 1966.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - no critical commentary - image not discussed at all in England national football team. Possibly more appropriate in 1966 FIFA World Cup Final, but only if there's a need to discuss the image there. Mosmof (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TFwire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:34, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic orphaned image JaGa^talk 20:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's encyclopedic and was previously used in Newton fractal, but appears to be largely redundant to File:Sin(x) detail.png. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KennethBarton.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image JaGa^talk 21:21, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iskkeul13.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 21:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.