Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Suslindisambiguator

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Template:CCIlist to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

{{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.

Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.

After examining an article:

replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}. The {{?}} template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).
Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)

If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Images

Examine the images below. For free images:
- Does the image look non-free? Is it likely the uploader is the copyright holder?
- Is the image properly licensed and sourced? Be aware of images that say "this image is licensed under X" without specifying who created it.
- Do a reverse image search using Google Images. Check the license of the source page. Compare the last modified time with the (Commons) upload time.
- Do a Google image search for phrases that describe the image's contents.
- See Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion#Addressing suspected copyright infringement on dealing with cases of possible image copyright infringement. There is no need to open a possibly unfree files listing. Administrators may delete images from multiple point infringers presumptively in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Evaluators who are not administrators may section images into a "deletion requested" section for administrator attention.

For non-free images, determine whether each image meets our non-free content criteria.
- Note that Commons does not accept non-free content.
Annotate the listing with the action taken, e.g. if the image was tagged no source write "no source"; if the fair use claim is deemed ok you can write "OK fair use".

Background

Suslindisambiguator

Suslindisambiguator (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Primefac deletions are unjustified. Consider the following:'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_of_Samuel_Johnson#Critical_response Suslindisambiguator (talk)

Check requested by Primefac (talk)
See the 20 pages listed here; in each case I removed a paragraph (or more) of text from the reference it was sourced to; unless I'm totally mistaken, we can't just chuck a verbatim copy into a {{blockquote}} and call it okay. Primefac (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac No you're right, if the quote is too long, it's considered a copyright violation. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 14:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- PD copying unattribed
- Harvey Buchanan Holl PD copying, unattribed, removed by Primefac just as I was about to add the attribution. User has 43k mainspace edits, will need offline surveyor. Sennecaster (Chat) 16:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  On the Wikipedia page for Oliver Holmes Gish, Primefac deleted all the block quotes: (3 sentences)
  
  He designed instruments for the measurement of air conductivity for the 1936 stratosphere flight of the balloon, Explorer II, and took part in two expeditions to study electrical phenomena associated with volcanic eruptions in Guatemala (1939) and Mexico (1945).
  
  With George R. Wait, his collaborator on the Thunderhead project, he also studied the effects of atomic bomb explosions on the Earth’s atmosphere. Gish was actively involved in instrument development for earth-currents, conductivity, and ionization research and developed his own designs for an electrometer.
  
  Some of my blockquoting might violate Wikipedia standards, but I think the Oliver Holmes Gish page is OK. In any case, it is probably not a good idea to delete the blockquotes and leave the page accessible, because in many cases, the blockquotes are necessary for the article. Instead of deleting the blockquotes, move the article to draft space.
  
  Consider the blockquoting in the following 3 Wikipedia articles: The Naked and the Dead, The Life of Reason, & 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) . Suslindisambiguator (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Maybe instead of invalid blockquotes, you actually write things in your own words? Primefac (talk) 17:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  If I think the blockquote is well-written, I am reluctant to rewrite the text. What makes the blockquotes "invalid"?
  
  Think about the following:
  
  https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Santayana
  
  In view of the many wikiquote pages, I view your anti-blockquoting efforts as somewhat absurd. Suslindisambiguator (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
James Percy Ault has clumsy paraphrasing from [1]; it's borderline, didn't fix it because I frankly have no idea what it actually means. E. J. Workman had an overquote, diff is the removal. James Ricker Wilson also has some, diff is removal. G. Raymond Satchler had enough quoting that it would straight up be a copyvio if the quotes weren't there. It still is a copyright concern because of how much is quoted compared to the article; half of its length was quite literally that quote.There is sufficient concern in respect to the quotes to open a case. I have not found evidence of unattributed translations from de.wiki, but I have of unattributed public domain copying. Sennecaster (Chat) 21:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing me of copyright violation is somewhat like accusing someone of theft — I object. So far as I can judge, Primefac has recently deleted block quotes from about 23 Wikipedia pages that I created (or contributed to). In some cases, the block quotes were only 2 or 3 sentences. I believe that there are hundreds of thousand of Wikipedia pages with considerably more block quoting. However, it might be better encyclopedic style to use block quotes in only a few cases such as criticism in literature, theology, or law. I still think that the block quotes should not have been deleted — instead the objectionable articles should have been moved to draft space. How can I find out what block quotes have been deleted? I did not save copies of the originals — I have no way of looking at what was deleted. Suslindisambiguator (talk)

@MER-C: Going to need the offline surveyor for this one. 43k mainspace. Sennecaster (Chat) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have just blocked this editor for copyright violations (committed today). The survey of contributions needs to be expanded to include all contributions up to present. -- Whpq (talk) 21:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq, Done. MER-C, Would you mind curling the edits, I've added them to Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Suslindisambiguator 09 The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 21:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

Subpages:

Suslindisambiguator

Suslindisambiguator (talk | contribs | deleted contribs | logs | block | block log)

Pages 1 to 20

Extended content

N Robley D. Evans (physicist) (1 edit): Y Three paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Michael C. F. Wiescher (1 edit): ? Single sentence copied, but I can't see another way to write it. Text removed as it is stated elsewhere on the page. Primefac (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Harold Spinka (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Ken'ichi Nomoto (3 edits): Y Paragraph removed. Primefac (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Laura Niedernhofer (1 edit): Y Reworded. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N King K. Holmes (3 edits): Y Paragraph removed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Evan D. Skillman (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N William Montagna (2 edits): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Glen Everett Woolfenden (3 edits): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Wolfgang Baumeister (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Luigi Naldini (1 edit): Y Paragraph removed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Robert Otto Pohl (1 edit): ? One longquote, but properly attributed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Roberto Poljak (1 edit): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Kazumi Maki (1 edit): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Allen Goldman (2 edits): N Primefac (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Sydney M. Finegold (2 edits): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Richard L. Guerrant (2 edits): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Russell Morse Wilder (1 edit): Y Two paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Francis V. Chisari (1 edit):Y One paragraph removed. Primefac (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Richard Allan Ferrell (2 edits): Y One paragraph removed. Primefac (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pages 21 to 40

Extended content

N James Pinfold (1 edit): ? potentially unnecessary longquote. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Darrell Lynn Judge (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Eric G. Adelberger (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Wai-Kai Chen (2 edits): Y removed 1 paragraph. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Moty Heiblum (2 edits): Y removed 1 paragraph. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N D. Frank McKinney (1 edit): Y removed 1 paragraph. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Robert Edward Black (1 edit): Y removed 2 paragraphs. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Johann Jakob Burckhardt (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Steven Michael Errede (1 edit): Y removed 1 paragraph. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Michael Jeffrey Balick (2 edits): Y removed 2 paragraphs. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Ernest Robert Sears (1 edit): Y removed 3 paragraphs. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Scott Alan Mori (1 edit): Y removed 2 paragraphs. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N John P. Vinti (2 edits): Y removed 2 paragraphs. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Martin Harvey Krieger (2 edits): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Claus Rolfs (2 edits): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N John Walter Thomson (1 edit): Y removed 1 paragraph. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Björn Dahlbäck (1 edit): Y removed 1 paragraph, reworded an unnecessary quote. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N David Galloway (botanist) (1 edit): Y 3.5 paragraphs removed. Primefac (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Jens H. Gundlach (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Felix Boehm (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 12:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pages 41 to 60

Extended content

N James W. Truran (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Jan Hoeijmakers (2 edits): Y, nix 4 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Charles Bixler Heiser (1 edit): Y, nix 1 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N James Allister Jenkins (1 edit): Y, nix 1 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Max D. Summers (1 edit): Y, nix 1 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N George Salt (1 edit): Y, nix 2 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N E. J. Workman (2 edits):Y, 1 para removed by Sennecaster. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Dov Levine (2 edits): Y 1 para listified. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Christopher J. Pethick (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Charles Joel Stone (2 edits):Y, nix 3 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Peter Wilfred James (1 edit): Y, sorted by another editor. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Peter M. Howley (6 edits): ? - single sentence, probably not worth removing as it is just a statement of what he is known for. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N J. William Costerton (2 edits): Y, nix 2 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N John Thompson Shepherd (1 edit): Y, nix 2 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Gordon S. Kino (2 edits): Y, nix 2 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Andrei Vladimirovich Roiter (3 edits): Y, nix 2 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Eugenio Giuseppe Togliatti (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N James Ricker Wilson (2 edits):Y, 3 para removed by Sennecaster. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Robert Meservey (1 edit): Y, nix 3 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Theodore Christian Frye (1 edit): Y, nix 2 para. Primefac (talk) 09:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pages 61 to 80

Extended content

N Richard F. Casten (1 edit): Y removed 1 para. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Yury Mikhailovich Bunkov (5 edits): N excessive quotes but all properly sourced. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Dale J. van Harlingen (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Brian M. Boom (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Emanuel David Rudolph (1 edit): Y Removed 1 para. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Leo K. Bustad (2 edits): Y Removed 1 para. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Roger Cooper (paleontologist) (1 edit): Y removed 2 para. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Robert Harold Wasserman (1 edit): ? - removed 2 para, still heavy paraphrasing - might need more work. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Harvey M. Patt (2 edits): Y removed 1 para. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Vernon Barger (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Blayne Heckel (1 edit): Y removed 1 para. Primefac (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Earl McCune (2 edits): Y, 1 para Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Horton Corwin Hinshaw (3 edits): Y, 1 para Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Hermann Nicolai (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Igor Ekhielevich Dzyaloshinskii (3 edits): Y, 3 para Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Ernst Klenk (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Peter J. Twin (3 edits): Y, 2 para Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N Francis P. Bundy (2 edits): Y, 1 para Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N James Stirton (3 edits): N Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
N David W. Hertzog (1 edit): Y, 1 para Primefac (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pages 81 to 100

Extended content

Robert R. Wilson Prize (2 edits): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Grigory E. Volovik (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Paul Leslie Redfearn (1 edit): Y rmv 1 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Wilfred Borden Schofield (1 edit): Y rmv 2.5 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Edward H. Kass (2 edits): Y rmv 3 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Herbert L. DuPont (2 edits): Y rmv 2 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Brian John Coppins (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Shang-keng Ma (3 edits): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Joel M. Moss (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Klaus Wilhelm Roggenkamp (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Lawrence R. Pomeroy (1 edit): Y rmv 2 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N James Thomas Beale (3 edits): Y rmv 3 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N C. Stuart Houston (3 edits): Y rmv 3 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Krzysztof Gawedzki (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N George M. Fuller (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Roger Rosentreter (2 edits): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Mark Bolsterli (1 edit): Y rmv 2 para. Primefac (talk) 08:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Dan Kalman (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N William Hugh Feldman (3 edits): Y rmv 3 para Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
N Jean Dhombres (1 edit): N Primefac (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This report generated by ContributionSurveyor.java at 2022-09-25T09:24:41.704159975Z.

Instructions

Text

Images

Background

Suslindisambiguator

Contribution survey

Suslindisambiguator

Pages 1 to 20

Pages 21 to 40

Pages 41 to 60

Pages 61 to 80

Pages 81 to 100

Pages 101 to 120

Pages 121 to 140

Pages 141 to 160

Pages 161 to 180

Pages 181 to 200

Pages 201 to 220

Pages 221 to 240

Pages 241 to 260

Pages 261 to 280

Pages 281 to 300

Pages 301 to 320

Pages 321 to 340

Pages 341 to 360

Pages 361 to 380

Pages 381 to 400

Pages 401 to 420

Pages 421 to 440

Pages 441 to 460

Pages 461 to 480

Pages 481 to 500

Pages 501 to 520

Pages 521 to 540

Pages 541 to 560

Pages 561 to 580

Pages 581 to 600

Pages 601 to 620

Pages 621 to 640

Pages 641 to 660

Pages 661 to 680

Pages 681 to 700

Pages 701 to 720

Pages 721 to 740

Pages 741 to 760

Pages 761 to 780

Pages 781 to 800

Pages 801 to 820

Pages 821 to 840

Pages 841 to 860

Pages 861 to 880

Pages 881 to 900

Pages 901 to 920

Pages 921 to 940

Pages 941 to 960

Pages 961 to 980

Pages 981 to 1000