Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 September 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 4

[edit]

Category:Nutritional advice

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Nutrition guides. There's a clear consensus to rename, and while there isn't a strong consensus to a specific target, "Nutrition guides" has the most support due to the main article at List of nutrition guides. Any future discussions about a better name should probably play out over WP:RM for that article. bibliomaniac15 19:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The term "Nutritional advice" is a little too fuzzy to serve as a category name, whereas "Nutrition [or dietary] guidelines" captures the actual content of this category with real clarity. Anomalous 0 (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is to rename, but the best target still isn't clear.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, bibliomaniac15 17:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ottoman emigrants to England

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 September 19#Category:Ottoman emigrants to England

Category:Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (United Kingdom). Taking into account the consensus for the UK disambiguator, as well as the convention to use the full name in categories. bibliomaniac15 19:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Reason 1 - change case - no need for caps. Reason 2 - Wikipedia is global, these are projects in England and Wales. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC) [reply]
  • Oppose. I've taken advice from a senior civil servant in the Planning Inspectorate. Although most of the projects are in England the scope is not limited to England. Some big projects in Wales, Scotland and NI are included, though the rules for them are different. and they are sufficiently significant that we could expect articles about them.Rathfelder (talk) 20:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per Peterkingiron's logic above, keep the capitalization but specify what country or countries are involved. As a non UK person I never would have guessed based on the category name that it's their term. Dan Carkner (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 10:40, 4 September 2021 (UTC) [reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Balto (film)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 05:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. Expansion very unlikely. It looks as if the two articles are already in the parent categories so no need for a merge. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deans of law schools in India

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A subcat of Category:Law school deans where the rest of the subcats are for prominent law schools rather than based on nationalities of the Deans. I added some of the pages that were under this category under Category:Indian legal scholars because it didn't make sense to have two categories that had a majority of pages in both categories prior to my edits. The legal scholars category is essentially the same. Also, the user who created this category has been blocked indefinitely. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They can be, but we have two categories with the same purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So, then yours is a delete vote. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's better to be deleted because it's redundant to the already superseding category. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: No, it is not redundant. See my !vote below: you misread the category's title. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The parent Category:Law school deans is getting large, and could use more sub-categories, both by-school, and by-country-where-the-school is. Deleting this category would be a step backwards. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional sealed locations

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Whether a location is "sealed" or not seems like an arbitrary thing to base a category on, and there are hardly any category members that are actual locations. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Politics of Cabinda

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Cabinda independence movement. bibliomaniac15 19:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, this is neither about the politics of the Republic of Cabinda nor strictly speaking about the politics of the Province of Cabinda. The proposed name probably covers the content of the category best. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Frederick College athletics categories

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename all to correspond with correct naming convention for college sports teams. Verification of Lions nickname found in this Daily Press article from 2006. SportsGuy789 (talk) 00:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.