Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 January 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 21 January 23 >

January 22

[edit]

Moveable holidays

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 1#Moveable_holidays. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete/merge, "moveable" is just a POV. A holiday may be moveable on the calendar and fixed as a weekday, or fixed on the calendar and moveable as a weekday, or moveable on the Gregorian calendar and fixed on another calendar, or moveable on another calendar and fixed on the Gregorian calendar. With a neutral view, every observance is moveable and fixed. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The term "moveable holiday" has a long history of use (over 150 years, at least) to mean a holiday which occurs on a different date from year to year according to the Gregorian calendar. There is no ambiguity of the sort that you suggest. I would, however, suggest renaming the by-month categories to match the spelling of the parent categories. Grutness...wha? 23:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But is the movableness a defining characteristic of the observance? Bearcat (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not always, but frequently, yes. Grutness...wha? 00:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mohsen.a

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Inappropriate single-user category. —swpbT go beyond 20:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music video networks

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No significant difference between music television and music videos. All music TV channels use music videos. Rathfelder (talk) 16:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, although the nominator's rationale isn't quite the right reason why. "Music television" doesn't necessarily only use music videos, as it can also air live concerts and interviews and awards ceremonies and music-related films and reality shows related to music culture (e.g. Making the Band) but not comprising videos per se, and "music videos" can be distributed on other platforms besides television (e.g. Vimeo or YouTube). Rather, the real issue here is the distinction, entirely meaningless in this context, between networks and channels. These are unnecessary parallel categories for the same thing, Rathfelder's entirely right about that, but he was just wrong about the reason why that's true. Bearcat (talk) 21:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dhudiya films

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No indication of growth potential for the cat; parent organization is a redlink. —swpbT go beyond 15:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Neighbourhoods of Wola etc

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 February 1#Category:Neighbourhoods_of_Wola_etc. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: to keep the order. every part of the city is categorized using Category:/Borough/ and Category:Neighbourhoods of Warsaw Andrei (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Combined two similar items. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Thai male kickboxers

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted, see here. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(Also Category:Thai female kickboxers)
Nominator's rationale: Not quite sure about the best course of action, but as it stands Category:Thai male kickboxers is wholly redundant to Category:Thai Muay Thai practitioners. As the main Muay Thai category tree isn't organised as a subcat of kickboxing, I understand that the kickboxing tree is supposed to be used in the narrow sense, i.e. modern forms explicitly referred to as "kickboxing" and not including traditional forms such as Muay Thai. As such, all the articles currently in Category:Thai male kickboxers would appear to be miscategorised. The Muay Thai practitioners category isn't currently subcategorised by gender, but if needed, it'd probably be better to diffuse Category:Thai male kickboxers into a new Category:Thai male Muay Thai practitioners subcat rather than renaming this one, which is less complete. (Also related is Category:Thai female kickboxers, but it only has two members and could be manually dealt with once consensus is established for this one.) Paul_012 (talk) 06:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Holland & Holland Magnum rifle cartridges

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: to encompass other Holland & Holland cartridges such as .500/450 Nitro Express, .500/465 Nitro Express and .700 Nitro Express. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 05:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Eighth (United States)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. Only one article (the key article), and no sign that it's ever going to be expandable. Grutness...wha? 02:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_22&oldid=871692882"