Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 October 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 31

[edit]

Category:Church History

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete, without prejudice to future re-development of a historiography-related category under a similar name. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Which church? Editor2020, Talk 03:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The category Church History actually covers the history of all churchs and denominations. It is also an academic discipline that is studied and for which advanced degree are granted.
Here are the definitions and information I use to justify the creation of this category -

In addition my central goal of creating this category is to provide navigational links to all Wikipedia pages in a hierarchy of categories which readers, knowing essential—defining—characteristics of a topic, can browse and quickly find sets of pages on topics that are defined by those characteristics. WP:Category

  Bfpage |leave a message  10:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When a bad category is created (that shows a lack understanding of wp categorization) it makes sense to bring it to CFD asap. DexDor (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This new category takes a completely different approach to linking articles together in the study of Church history. It will not even resemble the Category:History of Christianity , which I believe is completely overwhelming and unorganized at this point. If someone is looking to study church history, it would be better to follow the pattern available from colleges and universities who have already developed a syllabus on the topic. That is the intent of this new category.
  Bfpage |leave a message  00:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I could support that idea as a subcategory of C:HoC. In that case, the name needs to be changed to make it clearer that the subcategory is the study of the History of Christianity rather than its content. Ignocrates (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any workable distinction between the study of Christianity and the study of the history of Christianity? DexDor (talk) 18:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's a great question. The better approach would be to start over with an RfC, make a proposal, and provide specific examples to show why a new category or subcategory is needed. Ignocrates (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The term for this is 'historiography' if I'm correct. Could be workable - however currently the category contains much more than historiography so purging would be needed to begin with. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The phrase "history of the study of" a given topic is also used by such sources as the Eliade/Jones Encyclopedia of Religion as the name for articles dealing with how the historical study of a given topic has been conducted and in some cases changed over time, and I think that there is probably sufficient material for an article on the "History of study of the Christian church" or "Historiography of the Christian church" under one such title. For the record, I support the article being kept and possibly renamed to one of the above if such is deemed preferable. John Carter (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.