Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarone Zober
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yarone Zober (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibally fails WP:GNG Mdann52 (talk) 08:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Very weak Keep: The article was created with the note Seems like a valid entry given the situation with Pittsburgh Mayor Bob O'Connor in 2006. He was once a deputy mayor and is now chief of staff of Pittsburgh mayor. There are a few sources online of his presence which may be sufficient to make him notable. Though I am still not convinced of his notability (how many deputy mayors are there, do they all deserve an article, does every politician at some position deserve an article), I will vote a weak keep. The article has been here for too long and can be kept with modifications and references. Samar (Talk . Contributions) 18:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - The impression I get is that this is a WP:BLP1E, and the one event was someone else's illness. No problem with recreating if he someday does become notable on his own. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 19:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He does not meet any of the criteria under WP:Politician. His most prominent accomplishment is that he's the chief of staff of a mayor. Every metropolitan city mayor has a chief of staff and if that alone qualifies one for notability, then all of them should have their own Wikipedia article. Also, he is a political appointee, not an elected official. User:Samar alluded to Zober previously being Deputy Mayor, but it was simply a temporary appointment by the previous mayor, Bob O'Connor, while he was on his deathbed, and Zober was only in the position for 26 days. So I think User:DoriSmith is right on the money regarding WP:BLP1E. Zober's appointment to Deputy Mayor is appropriately included here in the O'Connor article. Finally, the fact that an article has existed for a long time, as User:Samar alluded to, should never be a consideration in determining a subject's notability. Many articles slip through the cracks for a long time. The only issue should be: Does the subject meet the notability guidelines or not? --76.189.98.15 (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 21:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC) 21:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.