Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodman (1804 ship)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Woodman (ship). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Woodman (1804 ship)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found of any notability for this ship. Fram (talk) 09:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Transportation, and United Kingdom. Fram (talk) 09:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. I do not see anything near the amount of coverage needed to meet GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as NN; alternatively merge to Woodman (ship). Peterkingiron (talk) 16:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep How deleting this article about a ship that was shipnapped by pirates and swiftly rescued in any way bettering this encyclopedia? jengod (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I would prefer to Keep, but perhaps a careful merge will limit the unnecessary destruction of information. I am still baffled to understand how destroying information makes an encyclopedia better, or makes it possible for the article to improve, but wiser, more thoughtful people than I apparently disagree.Acad Ronin (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. What Merge article are you proposing be the target Acad Ronin?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, I would merge the article with the entry in the Woodman ship index. Acad Ronin (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acad Ronin, I was hoping for a link so I don't have to go searching for a page you are referring to. I look at a lot of AFDs every day. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. Woodman (ship)

Merge into Woodman (ship) per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE, as proposed by Acad Ronin. Please merge especially references, testifying to the historicity of the vessel. These are completely missing from the list! gidonb (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Woodman (ship) per others. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.