Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisecomm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 08:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wisecomm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created for promotional purposes. No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 06:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing 16:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above; no references found other than [1] (accusations of "grey-trafficking"), and the existing ones aren't sufficient. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Sources provided are not WP:RELABLE. Couldn't find any reliable coverage on my own. ~Kvng (talk) 04:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.