Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Journalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 11:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Western Journalism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too much of an advert, needs TNT. G11 contested. Atlantic306 (talk) 06:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - WP:SOFIXIT. Enormously popular news source. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 08:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup and Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. As for, TNT, I suggest effort is better used to WP:SOFIXIT.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deletion is not cleanup. This is a notable topic. Lepricavark (talk) 02:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.