Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WaveMachine Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete both. --MelanieN (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WaveMachine Labs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable computer software as the best I found was only this and this and I'm also bundling the company's software Drumagog as both almost seem symmetrical regarding information and notability and both of basically stayed the same since starting. Pinging past user Zundark and Blanchardb and also software user Czar.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Drumagog as software article of unclear notability. A search turned up no significant RS coverage. Thinking 'Weak Keep' for WaveMachine Labs, however, as I did find musicradar and recordingmag, which are significant coverage of WaveMachine Labs' Auria product. Dialectric (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable, run of the mill WP:ARTSPAM by editor with undeclared conflict of interest. Undisclosed paid editing is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not. Citobun (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both beither the company nor the product are notable. DGG ( talk ) 03:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.