Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voyager Classics Collection
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Voyager Classics Collection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book line. Dan from A.P. (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Dan from A.P. (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dan from A.P. (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The individual books are notable, but I see no reason for this particular imprint/collection of them to be. Jclemens (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.