Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vance Dickason

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vance Dickason

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. Simply being a technology journalist or having one trade association award does not make one notable, and the article appears self-promotional in nature. Rhombus (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 17:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 17:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Another clearly too soon as there's no better improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 08:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficient evidence that he is a particularly important authority in his field. DGG ( talk ) 03:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:GNG. No secondary reliable sources cover this person where an article is warranted. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.