Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valsa Nair Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valsa Nair Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia should never be used as a resume hosting site a.k.a. WP:NOTCV. This is a promotional page of the entity WP:PROMO with over citations WP:CITEKILL. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 02:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD; ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Refbombed BLP about a civil servant. Not a GNG pass IMV as the sources are either puff pieces or associated with the subject. Mccapra (talk) 04:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article is written as though the subject is the head of a government department, but Aaditya Thackeray is the Minister for Culture and Tourism, meaning that the article subject's designations as "Principal Secretary" in this area are genuinely secretarial. BD2412 T 18:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Glucken123 (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough references to passes WP:GNG, Though i have fixed Refbomb but the tone still looks like an advertisement. DMySon (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Many reliable references were added last time by me, Clearly passes WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. I would also like to ping GreenC who previously rejected PROD. Inspect61 (talk) 14:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not apparent. This is just a civil servant like many others doing her job. The article is written like a LinkedIn page; Wikipedia articles are not for self-promotion. Indian publications are generally not reliable sources for biographies; see Paid news in India. It is not apparent from the article why her job or anything she did are of particular importance. Sandstein 07:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Indeed no sigcov in Marathi or Hindi, as far as I could see. Largely mentioned in announcements by the government. Java Hurricane 07:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nearly all sources are routine news articles. Femina (ref#9) looked GNG worthy but its tagged as advertorial/promotional feature. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.