Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uno Bolt
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Uno Bolt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, promotional with links to promotion articles, and what information about it could probably be added to the film's article. Also, the creator of the article seems like a SPA but I can't confirm that with the information available. It's odd to have the article and then see the "v2" of this item was featured in a film which just makes this all seem promotional. – The Grid (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 13:42, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:ROUTINE and WP:SUSTAINED. schetm (talk) 12:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not notable and per WP:SUSTAINED. Barca (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A lot of programs on kickstarter are searchable, however, that does not mean they deserves an article. This program specifically have less than 50 backers. Wikipedia is not a product catalogue, not to mention that it does not have sustained coverage. Viztor (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.