Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under God (book)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to DC Talk. ✗plicit 23:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Under God (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Including:
Both the first book and its sequel appear to fail WP:NBOOK, which requires a book to be the subject of two or more non-trivial, independent works. I can find only one piece of coverage for each book: a Publishers Weekly review of Under God ([1]) and a Cross Rhythms review of Living Under God ([2]). Both reviews are additionally fairly short and not particularly in-depth. Lennart97 (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Merge Both to dc Talk per WP:ATD, since both meet V. Jclemens (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Jclemens: not a bad idea, since the authors make up two thirds of the trio. Any idea on how to merge it in (in which section, or a new section somewhere)? Lennart97 (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- A new section of "other media" might be doable. There are any number of other artists, Christian or otherwise, who've had books published by members... find one and imitate one as you see fit, assuming that's how this closes. Jclemens (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Jclemens: not a bad idea, since the authors make up two thirds of the trio. Any idea on how to merge it in (in which section, or a new section somewhere)? Lennart97 (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also agree with merge to dc Talk.VR talk 16:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.