Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twig (social networking)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twig (social networking)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem notable. Even when I Google [twig social network], most of the top 10 are not the right company.

This is probably partly because it is defunct, but if it were notable, there should still be significant historical references.

There are also no references cited. Mattflaschen - Talk 01:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article describing the features of a defunct proposition, without claim of notability. My searches are also finding nothing to suggest this attained notability, whether by WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Ally, the service is defunct and the article regarding it is unlikely to be expanded. Fails to establish notability.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.