Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Gorny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tomas Gorny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deproded by creator, Clearly fails Wikipedia:Notability (biographies). Next to no coverage of this person in any mainstream, reliable sources; those used in the article discuss some companies he was involved with and barely mention him. (And yes, I've reviewed the three sources added since my prod and they don't seem to change much). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:47, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 04:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's very borderline so I was hoping that others would weigh in, but based on the Businessweek profile and his being noted in mostly local coverage I'm going to go with a very hesitant weak keep. It may be too soon, but he does seem to be noted as the leader of some relatively new enterprises that are themselves borderline notable. Candleabracadabra (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Struck !vote above of blocked sock puppet, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.