Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thwack (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close. This needs to be taken to WP:RFD. I will update the RFD link here very soon. (non-admin closure) Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Update:RFD link Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_10#Thwack --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Thwack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete as an inappropriate redirect for non-notable "online community" which fails WP:PRODUCT, WP:GNG and has no reasonable reason to sit as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this title. Guliolopez (talk) 00:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- an inappropriate redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.