Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Twelfth Imam
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Geschichte (talk) 18:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Twelfth Imam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book that fails both WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG that has been tagged as needing additional references for ten years. There is only one reference, a list of books where the plot is briefly given. Aspects (talk) 00:12, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete: I did manage to find a couple reviews, one for Publishers Weekly and other from the Library Journal, but that was about it, meaning it doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK. Isabelle 🔔 14:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment, wow! a popular library book (WorldCat shows over 1000 libraries have it, and yet reviews are so scant, it may be a nyt best seller as an "inside the list" hit pops up in a goog search here (alas a subscription is required), and here shows 3 reviews (Booklist in addition to the 2 mentioned above) so with multireviews plus a (highly likely) bestseller it meets WP:NBOOK and is a keep from me. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – bradv🍁 00:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – bradv🍁 00:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Number 8 on this list of best-sellers from November 2010. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.