Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spinoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arguments from both the sides are compelling. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 04:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Spinoff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable magazine lacking independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 02:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article is old and needs updating, but The Spinoff is getting bigger and is no longer just about TV like it started. It now does really good news articles and opinion pieces and is up there with Stuff and The New Zealand Herald|NZ Herald]]. [1] on the article has some good information that needs to be added and when I have some time, I'll look for more as well. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 04:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article is not old, this Afd was posted the same day the article was created. It also looks to be somewhat promotional, does not seem to pass GNG. Looks like a standard case of deletion to me. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 08:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:44, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - might be a case of wp:toosoon, but currently can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Has been nominated for a number of Canon Media Awards: 2016 (best lifestyle/entertainment site (won), website of the year, best sports site), 2017 (website of the year, best blog site) [2] Furius (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is now are large media organisation in New Zealand. Probably the third largest online readership. Here are a couple of news articles that could help flesh it out the article ShakyIsles (talk) 01:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.