Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sonia Uribe Files

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the subject of the article does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines at this time. Mz7 (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Sonia Uribe Files

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No sources other than two external links: the official website, which is a dead link; and the IMBD page, which doesn't even list a single completed episode. The first episode was to be on the Loch Ness Monster, but I can't even confirm that that episode was ever finished production, let alone aired. I can find no reliable independent sources at all for this show. Meters (talk) 05:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 05:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Not even blogs on it. Galobtter (talk) 06:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing reliable about this show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juan1973 (talk • contribs) 10:01, November 9, 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Uribe--Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as the nominator says, footage of the Loch Ness Monster show exists online but there is no guarantee that it was ever completed, let alone aired on any TV station. The intended series certainly never materialised so there is little reason to have an article about a TV series which in fact was never made. Richard3120 (talk) 23:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This show was never aired. This should be deleted as it undermines Wikipedia's credibility. Wikipedia shouldn't allow anyone to have a page. Wikipedia must improve their criteria. — Juan1973 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 00:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

@Juan1973:I don't disagree with your view on deleting the article, but weren't you one of the major contributors to it in the first place, and in fact your only edits in ten years on Wikipedia have been to the Sonia Uribe articles? Bit strange now telling Wikipedia they shouldn't have the article. Richard3120 (talk) 00:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the same thing.... Meters (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would not be the first time someone created an article (or two) and then realized they made a mistake, and that includes me. It's also possible that User:Juan1973 is affiliated in some way with User:Central2017 but of course we'd want to avoid WP:OUTING. Delete per nom. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to imply that I thought anything nasty was going on now. I noticed, assumed there had had likely been a bit of COI promotion 10 years ago, and was happy to see the support tor deletion now. If anything, I was surprised that the user could still login after 10 years. Meters (talk) 07:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I also summon Sir Wikipedia and ask that he sink this page to the abyss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PiaM (talk • contribs) 02:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC) — PiaM (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:22, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails even our basic notability policies. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.