Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rain Goddess

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Peter Stiff. Sandstein 08:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Rain Goddess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:GNG. The sources provided include one partial review in a compilation of a review of the genre that is Rhodesian military pulp fiction. Everything else is either sales pages, blogs, or doesn't actually mention the book. Searching for the book and author's name in my WP:BEFORE turned up nothing new. -Indy beetle (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. In addition to the source mentioned by the nom, this article talks about how Stiff portrays the guerrillas' use of weapons. In addition, I found a review from a Zimbabwean nationalist/patriot standpoint. All the flaws of Zimbabwean media notwithstanding, it would regard it as a reliable account of how the book was seen by Zimbabwe's regime at the time. Furthemore, said review states that "The Rain Goddess, by Peter Stiff has been described by The Natal Mercury, Durban, as the ‘classic novel on the Rhodesian War’" and refers to "many online reviews". Thus it would be a task to find these "many" reviews, or at least some. Geschichte (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.