Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Psychology of Wealth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G5. ✗plicit 13:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Psychology of Wealth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable self-help book. My BEFORE reveals mainly advertising, amazon, and blogs, without any substantial independent coverage. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 08:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Self published book. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and salt. It's a clear CSD. Thoroughly non-notable self-published book. Puff piece circumvented by the article creator (a sock) when his vanity wiki-bio was deleted repeatedly. RationalPuff (talk) 10:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinated: do you mean 'sock' or is the guy an out and out drunk? :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. well spotted. although perhaps both fits well in this case. RationalPuff (talk) 12:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now tagged as G5, as creator was blocked.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of any notability Dexxtrall (talk) 22:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, no independent coverage available. Rickshaw Takahashi (talk) 16:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This page is improving, so please give it a chance.103.40.197.94 (talk) 02:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.