Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Inability to Smile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. I wasn't able to send the student a copy of the content as their email wasn't enabled, but I've left a recommendation of how they could otherwise contribute to Wikipedia on another student's talk page. Offhand there's nothing here that can be merged, as it's all WP:OR. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Inability to Smile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violation of no original research and what Wikipedia is not. See also: Draft:The Inability to Smile. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Pure WP:OR, and depressing since an instructor has set an injudicious project, top the disadvantage of the students. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Undisclosed Jamaican school writing project is discussing the project 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not encyclopedic CT55555 (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Non-encyclopedic material. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Come Let Us Sing Anyway. The book the story is in is notable, so the summary of the short story could go there, and the editor should be encouraged to redirect their attention to non-OR editing on a story that is in itself a valid topic for wiki coverage. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Another collection of original research. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 04:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete preferably speedy, as a cocktail of OR, SYNTH, NOTESSAY and NOTHERE. SN54129 15:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.