Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fyrelit Tragedy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Fyrelit Tragedy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Kirkus reviewed it (link) as part of their Kirkus Indie program which is a paid review service and does not count towards notability. I was unable to find any other reviews or coverage in independent and reliable (i.e., non-blog) sources. The authors do not have Wikipedia articles, so there is not a good redirect target (well, the series has an article, but I'm also nominating that for deletion separately). DanCherek (talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. DanCherek (talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's just nothing to establish notability for this book or for the series as a whole. I searched and despite some mild popularity in SPS, this never turned into coverage in the places that Wikipedia would see as reliable, notability giving sources. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Worldcat lists around 80 libraries holding this book, so would expect there to be reviews somewhere, but apart from the kirkus indie mentioned above (thanks ReaderofthePack), trawling thru the first 100 pages of a googsearch have been unable to find any, just the usual selling sites and user generated ones, even ISFDB doesn't list any, so its a delete as not meeting WP:NBOOK. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.