Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dragon of Despair
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Dragon of Despair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Possibly worth redirect to Jane Lindskold#Bibliography. Has been in CAT:NN for 12 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I've added some reviews to the article and removed a blatant copyvio. It should now meet WP:NBOOK, though I will refrain from !voting (note: other articles about related books might need the same attention). Isabelle 🔔 17:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. In my search, I noticed that the book was reviewed by Kirkus, Publisher Weekly and Library Journal. I can't find the original link of the last source. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:NBOOK with muliple reviews as noted above, and here is a listing of another review by Vector. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:NBOOK and WP:N as shown above. -- Biel8729 13:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. I've expanded the article and also added two newspaper reviews. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 13:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, now clearly passes WP:NBOOK.Jackattack1597 (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.