Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Test to Destruction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dangerous Visions. Relevant content can be merged from article history. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Test to Destruction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (books) supplement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." (I'll add that I see snippets in an anthology or two introducing this, possibly written by the anthology or magazine editors that can be a bit independent, but I cannot confirm there is any WP:SIGCOV). It was deprodded with no useful rationale, so let's discuss this here. Can anyone find anything to save this? If not, the best WP:ATD would be to redirect this to the anthology Dangerous Visions or the author Keith Laumer. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 10:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.