Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TO THE NEW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the sockpuppetry. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TO THE NEW

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For now a promotional article about a company that fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Previously A7'ed but was removed by an IP. Lapablo (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Press releases and primary sources are insufficient to establish WP:CORP notability here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The best source I can find is this article from Inc42, a site about Indian tech startups, and even that single article extensively quotes the startup itself. Every other source in the article is primary, and I'm not finding anything else that would advance notability. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 22:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article reads like a promotional blurb, not a Wiki entry.TH1980 (talk) 02:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article is notable and has many citations to support from various Business News Websites. Moreover, The seemingly promotional content has been removed and citations from reliable sources have been added.--sheenamalhotra182 (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2019 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet !vote. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TO THE NEW is not small, it is notable to me. It has international presence and the article uses significant citations from reliable secondary sources to back up everything written. I don't think the article fails WP:GNG or WP:NCORP --Echoes 2009 (talk) 10:20, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet !vote. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article which does no more than describe a company going about its business, supported by routine announcements of takeovers, consolidations, etc. The July 2017 item from Inc42 item about the company's involvement in a project is probably the most substantial but is not, in my view, sufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP and what's up with that page title? Masum Reza^📞 06:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 09:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.