Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Parade Avenue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Parade Avenue

Non-notable avenue Balloholic (talk) 03:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Another NN Dublin street. Nothing here but a map in prose. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I find it a strange decision to relist an article with only one comment. But then it is a delete comment for a place in Dublin so I can hardly be surprised. These are rare species so we cannot let them become extinct. --Balloholic (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - Non-notable avenue that isn't available on google of which there are too many and Dublin seems to be overflowing with them. --Balloholic (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is the nominator voting again. Snappy (talk) 08:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a vote. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 09:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vote or not, the nominator is not supposed to comment with a Delete comment again. Snappy (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Another NN Dublin street. Nothing here but a map in prose. Peterkingiron (talk) 01:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You already commented before relisting... Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 09:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Above user already "voted".--Oakshade (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - NN Dublin street Snappy (talk) 08:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as per Mgm. Snappy (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable Dublin street, important as a way to reach the Sydney Parade railway station which has gained popularity in the youth culture in recent years. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Streets that give their name to other buildings (like railway and underground/subway stations) are notable. -Mgm|^(talk) 20:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficiently notable , per MacGyver's argument, which i think also applies for other streets. DGG (talk) 05:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a directory (period. full stop.) I'm really getting tired of this rash of Dublin-related articles about streets that are slightly less noteworthy than the gas station down the street from my house. Just because something exists and someone, somewhere publishes some minor blurb that mentions said thing in passing, doesn't make it notable. Trusilver 09:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - If it's significant enough to give its name to a rail station an other buildings, then its notable.--Oakshade (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment and that means...what exactly? The fact that buildings are named after the street doesn't confer notability to the street itself. As far as I can tell, the only thing it means is that the person who named the buildings is unimaginative. Trusilver 08:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.