Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Smith (Charity CEO)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 20:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Smith (Charity CEO)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe it should have been deleted per WP:A7. Now, it fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 10:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete I declined the A7 tag on the basis that the Guardian mention and Insight on Conflict profile provided a modest claim to significance. However, having undertaken a proper hunt for sources, I've concluded that the necessary coverage just isn't out there - he's a regular soundbite contributor for many publications, but no-one seems to have written anything much about him. As a corollary, I've also failed to find any decent coverage of Action On Armed Violence, his charity - since the two are closely related and are problematic for the same reason, I've added it to this nomination. Lack of coverage means that it seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the article about Action On Armed Violence should also be deleted due to lack of significant coverage. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 12:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.