Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star/Buddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 21:37, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Star/Buddy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as unreferenced and non-notable since September 2011. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. Prod removed with edit summary of "deproded - so why not redirect it?) " Not sure I see this as a valid search term, surely searchers will look for the individual tracks, not the combined artificial title used by WP. Richhoncho (talk) 08:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (albums) Albums should only have an individual article if there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article. Even if an album is otherwise notable, there is no reason to indefinitely keep an article which can only list the names of the songs and who performed them It's clear that while this could be argued "notable" there isn't enough material to create a reasonably detailed article. I propose turning this into a redirect per the same guideline Albums that don't have an individual article should redirect to another relevant article, such as the artist or band in question. Bryce Carmony (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – or redirect to Basement Jaxx or Basement Jaxx discography page. Lachlan Foley (talk) 06:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NALBUM, both songs fail WP:NSONG. Just because someone created it as an article once is not a reason to leave a redirect, and I have trouble seeing it as a likely search term. By the article author's own admission, this is a "rare" single. ― Padenton|✉ 00:55, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.