Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stallo: Curse of the Shaman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stallo: Curse of the Shaman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NOTFILM. Other than an IMDB entry and one press release (in Norwegian) announced during post-production, there is no media coverage of the film. —Josh3580_talk/hist 07:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There just doesn't seem to be anything out there. I have no problem with its recreation when/if it gets more coverage, though. Since I have a feeling that the original editor is likely one of the people involved with the film, I'd give this recommendation: sending information to the big horror sites (HorrorNews.net, Fearnet, Bloody Disgusting, Shock Till You Drop, Ain't it Cool News, and the like) would help towards coverage in the long run. It wouldn't give it notability here and now necessarily, but it'd help get word out and gain more coverage over time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ultra-low-budget movie that hasn't been released and may not be. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and the above postings, with recreation if/when movie is released and meets WP:NOTFILM

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article does include an independent press article about the film, and I found another, and added information from both. (I was searching in Norwegian, and sources being in languages other than English is not a problem.) But this does not add up to sufficient coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline, let alone the notability guideline for films, and the Norwegian Wikipedia article, to which I have linked ours, is minimal and unreferenced, so no help there. Too soon, I'm afraid. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.