Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short prose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short prose

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic and the article have one thing in common - they consist of short prose. Article has been unsourced since 2007. Notability needs to be reviewed. Coin945 (talk) 05:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub (talk) 10:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TNT. While it is lightly sourced, this treatment of the topic does not really consider it in a broad and historic way that it needs to be. We would be much better served by restarting this entirely than leaving this article that is way too focused on a small issue. Especially since it does not seem to in any way deal with how this interacts with the thing it would seem to be most similar to Short story.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete some of this might find a home in the prose article, but it's not sourced and therefore OR. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Alexandermcnabb. This is an extension of the same topic and not appropriate for a whole other article. Archrogue (talk) 18:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.