Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Barrett
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The consensus is clearly that he does not meet the criteria for an article at this time PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Shane Barrett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage. PROD was contested without any explanation. JMHamo (talk) 22:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 22:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:03, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - per GS. Like all the irish footballers nominated in the last couple of months, he has not played in a fully professional league nor played senior international football or received significant non-routine coverage for any other activity within football. The sources presented are nothing more than routine repots. Perhaps there is more of a need to look at these AfDs as a group rather than individually? Fenix down (talk) 12:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.