Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Fox (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Whether to redirect and where to is an editorial decision. Sandstein 11:08, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shadow Fox

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NBOOK and a WP:BEFORE didn't reveal anything besides a single review [1]. Couldn't find any information on the publisher. Previous AfD was about a different subject. Isabelle ^🔔 01:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Isabelle ^🔔 01:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The ForeWord review was done through their paid service, so it's not considered to be usable as far as notability giving goes. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and return back to a Zoids redirect. There's just nothing out there to show that this book passes NBOOK. It looks to have gone the same route as most indie or self-published books have gone - it was released, but gained no attention in places that Wikipedia would see as usable. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 00:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.