Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schoolr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG. Allied45 (talk) 10:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. References currently in the article clearly don't establish notability. I cannot find significant coverage in independent reliable sources to add to the article to establish notability. Deli nk (talk) 11:54, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG among others. No notability. Skirts⁸⁹ 22:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The Lifehack and Lifehacker items are basic listing notices and not in my opinion sufficient to demonstrate notability, nor are searches finding better. (The schoolr.com front-end subject of the article appears distinct from the schoolr.io tutoring Q&A site and the Italian schoolr.net tuition site for which the article was briefly repurposed, both of which would also fall short of notability.) Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.