Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanad Rashed (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deleted by Lectonar. --BDD (talk) 22:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sanad Rashed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SCHOLAR and WP:AUTHOR. Page based on primary sources. While it makes the claim that he is the first to explore the horror science fiction genre, I can only find the one source for it and am unable to find any other reliable sources. Formally deleted through AfD, recreated with the exact same issues. Coffeepusher (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete & salt — Recreated against consensus. This article's subject fails every WP:BASIC criterion, and is far from meeting higher standards reserved for WP:CREATIVE and WP:SCHOLAR subjects. JFHJr (㊟) 19:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedied as a G4; could someone please close this? Lectonar (talk) 12:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.