Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samavia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Lost Prince (Burnett novel). Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samavia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No external notability or reasons to describe its history here. I don't think it even needs to be merged to the main book article - I can't find references to some of these things outside the text of the novel itself. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Redirect. I can't find any coverage of this fictional country, which is from a work by Burnett so obscure I have never heard of it despite having read quite deeply into her back catalogue. It might be useful to distill this down into 3-4 sentences on Samavia in a "setting" section for the main article, but that is the most that is needed. And it would be fine to simply delete. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added a "setting" section to The Lost Prince (Burnett novel); I now think the best course is a redirect, to better preserve edit attribution. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Redirect to The Lost Prince (Burnett novel). I see some passing mentions but no in-depth coverage. The article is a plot summary with no attempt at analysis. Redirect will do perfectly fine here. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/redirect per all. There isn't coverage to support this topic as its own article. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.